Contesting Community: Legalized Reconciliation Efforts in the Aftermath of Genocide in Rwanda
نویسندگان
چکیده
In recent decades, national governments and international authorities have increasingly emphasized the role of legal institutions in restoring order after political violence. This study explores how, following the 1994 genocide, the Rwandan government created new decentralized grassroots legal forums that aimed to produce community out of a divided population. The legal institutions were designed to enable Rwandans to resolve disputes with the help of locally-elected mediators, based on principles that prioritized collective cohesion over individual rights, combined with state-backed punishment. Drawing on eighteen months of ethnographic research in Rwanda between 2004 and 2008 with genocide courts (inkiko gacaca), mediation committees (comite y’abunzi) and a legal aid clinic, this study shows how the discourse of mediation in courts derived from national and transnational processes, and how it shaped people’s experiences across a wide range of disputes. People used the courts’ flexible proceedings both to rebuild inclusive relationships, and to contest belonging and reinforce divisions. The study suggests that state-backed legal forums embedded in daily life can facilitate social rebuilding in the aftermath of violence, while it examines what differences are created as “community” is brought into being through politicized processes, and shows how customary law as a tool of state development can both empower and curtail rights. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Anthropology First Advisor Sandra T. Barnes Second Advisor Steven Feierman Third Advisor Kathleen Hall
منابع مشابه
Healing, Reconciliation, Forgiving and the Prevention of Violence after Genocide or Mass Killing: an Intervention and Its Experimental Evaluation in Rwanda
This article describes a theory–based intervention in Rwanda to promote healing and reconciliation, and an experimental evaluation of its effects. The concept of reconciliation and conditions required for reconciliation after genocide or other intense intergroup violence are discussed, with a focus on healing. A training of facilitators who worked for local organizations that worked with groups...
متن کاملBeyond the Status-Quo: Cultivating Peace in Post-Genocide Countries
This paper asserts that constructively remembering past atrocities is central to the formation of a lasting, multi-faceted peace in post-genocide societies. The Rwandan case-study first illustrates the dynamics of a society affected by genocide, as well as critically analyzes the integrity of its peace. Secondly, the role of collective memory in reconciliation is discussed at length, including ...
متن کاملReconciliation and Justice after Genocide: A Theoretical Exploration
This article argues that the post-conflict reconciliation process is undermined by the importance given to the retributive form of justice dominating peacebuilding and transitional justice measures. Retributive justice reinforces the division between perpetrator and victim, thus undermining the reconciliation process between antagonistic parties. The so-called objective categories of perpetrato...
متن کاملRethinking Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
Introduction: Truth Commissions and Memory Practice 2 Conflict, Recovery, and Social Forgetting in Sierra Leone 3 Studying Truth Commissions Ethnographically 5 “Revealing is Healing”? 6 Memory Practices and Sierra Leone’s TRC 7 Forgiving and Forgetting 8 Accountability vs. Reintegration 11 Recommendations 12 ABOUT THE REPORT As the international community reflects on the tragedy in Rwanda ten y...
متن کاملPromoting Reconciliation A er Genocide and Mass Killing in Rwanda—and Other Postcon ict Settings: Understanding the Roots of Violence, Healing, Shared History, and General Principles
In the a ermath of genocide, mass killing, or intractable—persistent and violent—con$ ict between groups, how can members of these groups continue to live together and build a nonviolent future.1 How can they create reasonably harmonious relations? Increasingly, research and observations have shown that when violent con$ icts end, even if they end by a peace agreement—rather than one party defe...
متن کامل